UN Disarmament Chief: Risk of Nuclear Weapon Use Is Highest Since Cold War

The United Nations disarmament chief warned Friday that the risk of a nuclear weapon being used is higher now than at any other time since the Cold War.

“The war in Ukraine represents the most acute example of that risk,” High Representative for Disarmament Izumi Nakamitsu told a Security Council meeting.

The meeting was requested by Ukraine, and supported by the United States and Albania, to discuss Russia’s March 25 announcement that it plans to station tactical nuclear weapons on Belarusian territory.

“When it comes to issues related to nuclear weapons, I wish to be clear at the outset: All states must avoid taking any actions that could lead to escalation, mistake or miscalculation,” she said.

Nakamitsu added that all parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons – nuclear-weapon states and non-nuclear-weapon states – should strictly adhere to their commitments and obligations under the treaty.

Nakamitsu urged states to return to dialogue and de-escalate tensions, and she appealed specifically to Russia and the United States to return to full implementation of the New START Treaty, a major arms control pact between the two powers.

Russia said last month it would no longer comply with New START, and it announced this week that it would stop sharing nuclear weapons data twice a year. Washington said it would withhold its nuclear data in an effort to encourage Moscow to return to compliance with the treaty.

At the council meeting, the two envoys verbally sparred over who had violated or withdrawn first from a number of arms control treaties.

On the issue of Russia’s planned deployment of tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus, the U.S. envoy urged Moscow to reconsider.

“Russia should immediately cease escalatory rhetoric around the use of nuclear weapons,” Ambassador Robert Wood said. “Any use of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons in Ukraine would have severe consequences for the maintenance of international peace and security and would fundamentally change the nature of this war.”

He also urged Belarus to cease its complicity with Russia’s invasion. Russia staged part of its invasion of Ukraine from Belarus.

Russia’s envoy said Moscow is not violating its international non-proliferation obligations.

“President Putin was clear about the fact that we are not transferring nuclear weapons,” Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said. “We are talking about the transfer to Belarus of operational, tactical missile complexes, Iskander-M missiles. We are talking about the retrofitting of airplanes at the Belarusian airport and the training of teams and the construction of a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus — and all this will be under Russian control.”

Nebenzia claimed Moscow is stationing the weapons in Belarus to protect its ally from Western threats, as the West sends more weapons to Ukraine.

Just days after Moscow’s February 24, 2022, invasion of Ukraine, a referendum in Belarus approved a new constitution ending its non-nuclear-state status, paving the way for the Kremlin to move tactical nuclear weapons there.

“Belarus is not prepared to attack anyone first, but rather is responding appropriately using all existing capacity — responding to any foreign aggression,” Ambassador Valentin Rybakov told the meeting. “This cooperation between Russia and Belarus is nothing new.”

Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya denounced the move.

“Belarus is not a Russian military base — it’s an independent country of free people. We can’t let Lukashenka turn our country into a nuclear wasteland,” she said on Twitter Friday about President Alexander Lukashenko.

Council members expressed concern about the proliferation of nuclear weapons and said regressing on nuclear commitments must stop.

“Backsliding in disarmament must stop before it renders the NPT a dead letter,” Brazilian Ambassador Ronaldo Costa Filho warned of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Burkina Faso Banning Free Press ‘Bit by Bit,’ Says France 24 Journalist After Broadcaster’s Suspension

The journalist whose interview with a terrorist organization resulted in Burkina Faso suspending France 24 has spoken with VOA about what he says is a decline in media freedoms in the country.

Burkina Faso’s military government suspended the international broadcaster after it aired an excerpt of an interview with the head of a regional al-Qaida affiliate earlier this month.

The journalist who conducted the interview, Wassim Nasr, told VOA that the Burkinabe leadership has been looking for a reason to shut down the network as part of an ongoing effort to control the flow of information in the country.

“When we speak to Burkinabe journalists or human rights activists or social or civil society activists, they all feel that banning free press is happening today, bit by bit,” Nasr told VOA. “And they are very scared of speaking out about things that are happening and what’s going wrong in the country.”

VOA reached out to Burkinabe authorities for comments, but inquiries went unanswered at the time of publication.

Burkina Faso government spokesman Jean-Emmanuel Ouedraogo said the France 24 interview with the head of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, amounted to acting as a mouthpiece for the terror group.

“Without contesting the freedom of the channel’s editorial choices, the government nevertheless questions the ethics that govern the professional practice of journalism on France 24,” he said.

The suspension has also been met with criticism from press freedom organizations, including Reporters Without Borders, which called the move “a blatant attack on press freedom” and urged the government to lift the suspension immediately.

The suspension follows a move by the government to suspend the French radio broadcaster Radio France Internationale in December for its reporting on terror attacks.

Dieudonne Zoungrana, editor-in-chief of the daily newspaper Aujourd’hui au Faso, told AFP the climate for journalists in the country is very tense, but said the country is in a time of war and the government is naturally hesitant to give a platform to the enemy.

“With this axe that fell on France 24, it is also a warning shot for the local press, for the national press, that must be a bit careful,” Zoungrana told Agence France-Presse.

“Because in the background, it is based on how to treat information in times of war, how it should be treated. Do we have to say everything? Do we have to give everyone the floor? There are some problems that are currently being raised.”

Nasr said the interview with the terrorist group al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb head Abu Obeida Youssef al-Anabi, also known as Yezid Mebarek, was nearly a year in the making. He sent Mebarek 17 recorded questions and Mebarek responded with voiced answers.

Nasr said France 24 only played 20 seconds of the audio as proof that the terror leader was making the statements. He added that he was careful to put Mebarek’s statements in context and include contradictory facts when necessary.

“I analyzed what he said. I picked out the interesting informational parts of what he said. I contextualized it and even contradicted him on many issues,” Nasr said.

For example, when Mebarek said AQIM was not responsible for a massacre in Solhan, Burkina Faso, which took the lives of at least 138 people, Nasr said his sources indicate it was, indeed, a unit of AQIM which was “undisciplined.”

“I said on screen that he was wrong, that they are responsible, despite the fact that he denied it,” Nasr said.

Nasr said that for a journalist, talking to an extremist leader is important in order to help viewers understand their ideology and tactics. It is not equivalent to justifying their actions or giving them a platform to recruit.

“As far as I am concerned, talking to jihadists and interrogating them and asking them questions is part of my job,” he said. “We are journalists, so we have to talk to all parties. I am not the spokesperson of the French Government, neither of the Burkinabe government, neither of any government. It is my job to talk to all parties.”

Some information in this article came from Agence France-Presse.

VOA Newscasts

Give us 5 minutes, and we’ll give you the world. Around the clock, Voice of America keeps you in touch with the latest news. We bring you reports from our correspondents and interviews with newsmakers from across the world.

VOA Newscasts

Give us 5 minutes, and we’ll give you the world. Around the clock, Voice of America keeps you in touch with the latest news. We bring you reports from our correspondents and interviews with newsmakers from across the world.